Anna

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILLIAM J. WHITSITT, No. 2:20-cv-01484-TLN-KJN Plaintiff, v. ORDER ANNA et al, Defendants. 16 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff William J. Whitsitt’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion for Reconsideration and Objections to the U.S. Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations (ECF No. 5), which the Court construes together as a Motion for Reconsideration pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 60(b). For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff’s Motion (ECF No. 6) is DENIED. /// /// /// /// /// /// /// I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, initiated this action on July 22, 2020. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff alleges the California Employment Development Department (“EDD”) and three EDD phone representatives violated his due process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment by failing to provide him with unemployment insurance benefits in a timely manner. (See…