Garcia

(PC) Dillingham v. Garcia

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 4, 20211:18-cv-00579California954 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JERRY DILLINGHAM, Case No. 1:18-cv-00579-NONE-EPG (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S SECOND

REQUEST FOR APPOINTMENT OF AN

v. EXPERT WITNESS

F. GARCIA, (ECF NO. 155) Defendant. 15 16 17 Jerry Dillingham (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 18 pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 On December 16, 2019, Plaintiff filed a motion for, among other things, appointment of 20 an expert witness. (ECF No. 89). This motion was denied. (ECF No. 112). 21 On August 2, 2021, Plaintiff filed a second motion requesting appointment of an expert 22 witness. (ECF No. 155). This motion is now before the Court. For the reasons that follow, the 23 Court will deny Plaintiff’s second motion for appointment of an expert witness.

I. LEGAL STANDARDS

25 The Court has the discretion to appoint an expert pursuant to Rule 706(a) of the Federal 26 Rules of Evidence. See Walker v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.