(PC) Amie v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ERIN R. AMIE, Case No. 1:20-cv-00244-AWI-JLT (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S v. MOTION FOR THE COURT’S

ASSISTANCE AND MOTION TO

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF REOPEN CASE

CORRECTIONS AND

REHABILITATION, et al., (Docs. 38, 44) Defendants. 17 Plaintiff has filed a motion for the Court’s assistance to “put a stop to control[led] feeding by medical. (Doc. 38.) Plaintiff has also objected to case closure (Docs. 39, 42) and filed a motion to reopen case (Doc. 44), with supporting declarations. (Docs. 40, 41.) On September 22, 2020, this Court held that this case terminated automatically upon Plaintiff’s filing of a Rule 41(a)(1)(A) voluntary dismissal despite the lack of a formal order. (Doc. 37.) See Com. Space Mgmt. Co. v. Boeing Co., 193 F.3d 1074, 1078 (9th Cir. 1999). The Ninth Circuit has explicitly held that “once a notice of voluntary dismissal is filed, the district court in which…