Romero

Romero v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 4, 20211:20-cv-01490California287 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAMUEL ROMERO, Case No. 1:20-cv-01490-DAD-BAM Plaintiff, ORDER RE STIPULATION FOR

PROTECTIVE ORDER

v. (Doc. 31) WAL-MART STORES, INC., a Delaware Corporation, and DOES 1-10, inclusive, 15 Defendants.

17 On August 2, 2021, the parties filed a stipulated protective order. (Doc. 15.) Following 18 review, the Court adopts the stipulated protective order. The parties are advised that pursuant to 19 the Local Rules of the United States District Court, Eastern District of California, any documents 20 subject to the protective order to be filed under seal must be accompanied by a written request 21 which complies with Local Rule 141 prior to sealing. The party making a request to file 22 documents under seal shall be required to show good cause for documents attached to a non- 23 dispositive motion or compelling reasons for documents attached to a dispositive motion. Pintos 24 v. Pacific Creditors Ass’n, 605 F.3d 665, 677-78 (9th Cir. 2009). Within five (5) days of any 25 approved document…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.