Youngblood

(PC) Norris v. Youngblood

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 4, 20211:21-cv-00704California1,081 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

URIE NORRIS, ) Case No.: 1:21-cv-00704-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER DIRECINT CLERK OF COURT TO v. ) RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE TO

THIS ACTION

DONNY YOUNGBLOOD, et al., ) ) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants. ) RECOMMENDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION ) FOR SANCTIONS BE DENIED ) ) (ECF No. 13) )

Plaintiff Urie Norris is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for sanctions, filed August 3, 2021. (ECF No. 13.) I. LEGAL STANDARD Procedurally, a federal district court may issue emergency injunctive relief only if it has personal jurisdiction over the parties and subject matter jurisdiction over the lawsuit. See Murphy Bros., Inc. v. Michetti Pipe Stringing,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.