Velasquez-Miranda

(PC) Lewis v. Velasquez-Miranda

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 5, 20212:21-cv-00932California748 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DARONTA TYRONE LEWIS, No. 2:21-cv-0932-JAM-EFB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

M. VELASQUEZ-MIRANDA, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, moves for a preliminary injunction. ECF No. 22. He also requests the appointment of counsel. Id. In his motion for preliminary injunction,1 plaintiff states that defendant N. Holets recently approached plaintiff’s cell at the California Health Care Facility and spewed the following racist and retaliatory threats, “[Y]our nigger ass is done. We told your nigger cripple ass back on 10/23/2018, don’t file no 602 nigger or shit with our fucking name on it to no fuckin judge or 24 1 A preliminary injunction represents the exercise of a far reaching power not to be 25 indulged except in a case clearly warranting it. Dymo Indus. v. Tapeprinter, Inc., 326 F.2d 141, 143 (9th Cir.1964). …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.