Farhat

(PC) Hearne v. Farhat

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 5, 20212:20-cv-00557California2,413 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 JOHN HEARNE, No. 2:20-cv-0557 JAM DB P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ALEX FARHAT, et al., Defendants. 15 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims he was purposely transferred to a prison where he had documented enemies in retaliation for filing grievances. Presently before the court is defendants’ motion to revoke plaintiff’s in forma pauperis (IFP) status. (ECF No. 62.) For the reasons set forth below the court will recommend that the motion be granted. BACKGROUND Plaintiff initiated this action with the filing of the original complaint. (ECF No. 1.) The court determined the original complaint stated cognizable failure to protect and retaliation claims but failed to state any additional claims. (ECF No. 9.) Plaintiff was given the option to proceed with the complaint as screened or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.