Aung

(PC) Jones v. Aung

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 6, 20212:18-cv-02940California2,787 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 LEROY NAPOLEON JONES, Case No. 2:18-cv-02940-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER THAT THE CLERK OF COURT

ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE TO THIS

v. CASE1 SANDAR AUNG, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

THAT DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR

Defendants. SUMMARY JUDGMENT BE GRANTED OBJECTIONS DUE IN 14 DAYS ECF No. 22 19 20 Leroy Napoleon Jones (“plaintiff”) alleges that, while he was incarcerated at Mule Creek State Prison, defendants Sandar Aung and Marianne Ashe, physicians both, violated his Eighth Amendment rights by denying him adequate medical care for a pilonidal cyst. Defendants have filed a motion for summary judgment and argue that the medical evidence establishes that they 25 26 1 Plaintiff has consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction, ECF No. 8, but defendants have not. 2 Defendants describe a pilonidal cyst as “a type of cyst which commonly occurs…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.