(HC)Murphy

(HC)Murphy v. Diaz

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 6, 20212:20-cv-01013California395 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MONRELL D. MURPHY, No. 2:20-cv-01013-TLN-CKD Petitioner, v. ORDER RALPH DIAZ, Respondent. 16 Petitioner Monrell D. Murphy (“Petitioner”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On June 29, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 21.) Neither party has filed timely objections to the findings and recommendations. Although it appears from the file that Petitioner’s copy of the findings and recommendations was returned, Petitioner was properly served. It is Petitioner’s responsibility to keep the Court apprised of his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.