Warden

(HC) Overton v. Warden

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 6, 20212:21-cv-00129California537 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL L. OVERTON, No. 2:21-cv-00129-TLN-DMC Petitioner,

ORDER

v. WARDEN, Respondent. 16 Petitioner Michael L. Overton (“Petitioner”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On May 27, 2021, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 6.) No timely objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed. The Court has reviewed the file under the applicable legal standards and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Federal Rules Governing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.