Hicks

(PC) Washington v. Hicks

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 6, 20211:19-cv-00156California693 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TRACYE BENARD WASHINGTON, 1:19-cv-00156-NONE-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR RECONSIDERATION

vs. (ECF No. 56.)

HICKS, et al., Defendants 16 I. BACKGROUND Tracye Benard Washington (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case now proceeds with Plaintiff’s Complaint filed on February 5, 2019, against defendants Sergeant David Hicks and Correctional Officer Hipolito Rocha (“Defendants”) for use of excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment. (ECF No. 1.)1 On May 27, 2021, the court issued an order denying Plaintiff’s request for recusal of the undersigned Magistrate Judge. (ECF No. 54.) On June 1, 2021, Plaintiff filed objections which the court construes as a motion for reconsideration of the order denying Plaintiff’s request for recusal. (ECF No. 56.) 27 1 On June 22, 2020, the court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.