Rather

(PC) Mills v. Rather

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 6, 20211:21-cv-00977California1,511 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAKAN CHAMEL MILLS, ) Case No.: 1:21-cv-00977-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO v. ) RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE TO

THIS ACTION

K. RATHER, et al., ) ) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION Defendants. ) RECOMMENDING THE ACTION BE ) DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO STATE A ) COGNIZABLE CLAIM FOR RELIEF ) ) (ECF No. 9)

Plaintiff Jakan Chamel Mills is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s first amended complaint, filed August 5, 2021. I. SCREENING REQUIREMENT The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The Court must dismiss a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.