Burlingham

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL CHRISTOPHER YOUNG, et al., No. 2:21–cv–537–TLN-KJN PS Plaintiffs, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. (ECF Nos. 8, 9, 11.) STEVEN RICHARD BURLINGHAM, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 In March 2021, plaintiffs, who are proceeding without counsel, filed claims against 13 defendants related to underlying proceedings in state probate court. (ECF No. 1.) On May 25, defendants Beyer, Brown, and Schreiber moved to dismiss, and defendant Pearl did so two days later. (ECF Nos. 8, 9.) After plaintiff failed to oppose, the court vacated the hearings under Local Rule 230(c), ordered plaintiffs to file opposition, and warned a failure to do so would constitute additional grounds for dismissal as well as implied consent to dismissal. (ECF No. 11.) Despite this warning, plaintiffs filed no opposition. For the reasons that follow, the court recommends plaintiffs’ claims be dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute.1 /// 27 1 This matter proceeds…