(PC) Harding v. Sacramento County Sheriff Dept

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 9, 20212:21-cv-00964California2,455 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRENT LEE HARDING, No. 2:21-cv-00964-CKD Plaintiff, v. ORDER SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiff is a county inmate proceeding pro se and seeking relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 18 1983. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 19 636(b)(1) and plaintiff has consented to have all matters in this action before a United States 20 Magistrate Judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). 21 Plaintiff requests leave to proceed in forma pauperis. As plaintiff has submitted a 22 declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), his request will be granted. 23 Plaintiff is required to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00 for this action. 28 U.S.C. §§ 24 1914(a), 1915(b)(1). By separate order, the court will direct the appropriate agency to collect the 25 initial partial filing fee from plaintiff’s trust account and forward it to the Clerk of the Court. 26 Thereafter, plaintiff will be obligated…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.