Warden

(PC) Bell v. Warden

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 9, 20212:21-cv-00534California267 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KEVIN BELL, No. 2:21-cv-0534 CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND WARDEN, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendant. 16 By order filed June 30, 2021, plaintiff’s amended complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file a second amended complaint was granted. The thirty-day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed a second amended complaint. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court assign a district court judge to this case. IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.