(PC) Deegan v. State of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SIDNEY ROSS DEEGAN, No. 2:19-cv-2219 TLN AC P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Defendants. 16 By order filed May 11, 2021, the complaint was screened and found to not state a claim for relief. ECF No. 8. Plaintiff was given thirty days to file an amended complaint and cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Id. at 7. After plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint, he was given an additional twenty-one days to amend the complaint and warned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed without further warning. ECF No. 9. Twenty-one days have now passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that the complaint be dismissed for failure to state a claim for the reasons set forth in the May 11,…