Amazon Logistics, Inc. v. Mann Bros. Transport Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 9, 20211:19-cv-01060California5,640 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

facts (Doc. No. 26-2 (“UF”)). In opposing the pending motion, defendant did not admit or deny that these facts are undisputed, as required by Local Rule 260, which provides that: Any party opposing a motion for summary judgment or summary adjudication shall reproduce the itemized facts in the Statement of Undisputed Facts and admit those facts that are undisputed and deny those that are disputed, including with each denial a citation to the particular portions of any pleading, affidavit, deposition, interrogatory answer, admission, or other document relied upon in support of that denial. Local Rule 260(b).

In its opposition to the pending motion, defendant states that it “attempted on numerous occasions to contact plaintiff via email and letter regarding the improper storage and abandonment of the [Trailer]” and “attempted to notify plaintiff and provided notice of the accruing storage charges and requested on numerous occasions that plaintiff remove the 22 [Trailer].” (Doc. No. 32 at 2.) However, defendant does not substantiate this assertion with any admissible evidence. Defendant cites…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.