(PC) Matlock v. Kern County

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 10, 20211:19-cv-01368California949 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RICHARD A. MATLOCK, Case No. 1:19-cv-1368-NONE-JLT (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO

FILE RESPONSE TO SCREENING

v. ORDER

KERN COUNTY, et al., (Doc. 27) Defendants. 14-DAY DEADLINE

16 On October 1, 2020, the Court found that Plaintiff’s first amended complaint stated a cognizable Fourteenth Amendment failure to protect claim against John Does #1, #2, and #3, and found no other cognizable claims. (Doc. 18 at 8.) The Court ordered Plaintiff to file a second amended complaint, notify the Court that he is willing to proceed only on the claim found cognizable, or notify the Court that he wishes to stand on his first amended complaint. (Id. at 9–10.) The Court cautioned: “If plaintiff fails to comply with this order, the undersigned will recommend the action be dismissed for failure to obey a court order and failure to prosecute.” (Doc. 10.) Plaintiff was transferred to a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.