Eaton

(PC) Swortzel v. Eaton

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 10, 20211:21-cv-00735California630 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRET LAWRENCE SWORTZEL, Case No. 1:21-cv-0735-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW

CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE

v. DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, FOR

FAILURE TO EXHAUST PRIOR TO FILING

EATON, et al., SUIT Defendants. (ECF No. 1) TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE 17 Plaintiff Bret Lawrence Swortzel (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action was initiated on May 7, 2021. (ECF No. 1.) Pursuant to the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (“PLRA”), “[n]o action shall be brought with respect to prison conditions under [42 U.S.C. § 1983], or any other Federal law, by a prisoner confined in any jail, prison, or other correctional facility until such administrative remedies as are available are exhausted.” 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). Prisoners are required to exhaust 25…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.