Abdur-Rahman

(PC) Parks v. Abdur-Rahman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 10, 20212:19-cv-01589California3,183 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 KENNETH WAYNE PARKS, Case No. 2:19-cv-01589-KJM-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO

AMEND BE DENIED AS UNECESSARY

v. ECF No. 49 SALAHUDDIN ABDUR-RAHMAN AND

RANDALL LANKFORD, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

THAT: Defendants. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT BE GRANTED

19 ECF No. 65

PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS TO STAY BE

DENIED AS MOOT ECF Nos. 57, 62, & 72 OBJECTIONS DUE IN 14 DAYS 24 25 Kenneth Wayne Parks (“plaintiff”) alleges that, while he was incarcerated at High Desert State Prison, defendants Salahuddin Abdur-Rahman and Randall Lankford violated his Eighth Amendment rights by failing to provide him with a liquid diet after surgery and allowing a staph infection to develop in his mouth. ECF No. 22 at 3-4. Defendants have filed a motion for 2 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.