Caballero

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Cesar Caballero et al., No. 2:21-cv-00638-KJM-CKD Plaintiffs, ORDER v. Michael Williams et al., 1S Defendants. 16 After reviewing the record, the court finds insufficient evidence plaintiffs effected service on any of the defendants. In California, service by email may be proper but only if a court finds “itis reasonably calculated to give actual notice to the party to be served.” See Cisco Sys. v. Shaitor, No. 18-00480, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106893, at *8 (N.D. Cal. June 25, 2018). The court cannot conclude on this record that is so. The only piece of evidence is that a non-party, counsel for the proposed intervenors, filed a document alleging he effected service by email on two of the five defendants. See Affidavit of Service, ECF No. 21. Assuming without deciding it is appropriate for a non-party to effect 25 service on behalf of plaintiff even when the party is…