Redick

Redick v. Sonora Police Department

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 10, 20211:21-cv-00287California6,268 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STANLEY E. REDICK, III, Case No. 1:21-cv-00287-NONE-SAB

Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER GRANTING

PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO FILE A THIRD

v. AMENDED COMPLAINT

SONORA POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., (ECF No. 11)

Defendants. THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE

15 I. INTRODUCTION Stanley E. Redick, III (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court for screening is Plaintiff’s second amended complaint filed on May 26, 2021. (ECF No. 11.) II. INSTRUCTIONS FOR PRO SE PLAINTIFF Plaintiff is proceeding pro se, meaning he is not represented by an attorney in this case. Given Plaintiff is pro se, the Court will first provide a summary of the primary reasons Plaintiff’s complaint is insufficient, and the instructions Plaintiff must follow if he decides to file a second amended complaint. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.