Eaton
(PC) Valdez v. Eaton
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FELIX ENRIQUE VALDEZ, Case No. 1:21-cv-0734-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW
CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE
v. DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, FOR
FAILURE TO EXHAUST PRIOR TO FILING
EATON, et al., SUIT Defendants. (ECF No. 1) TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE 17 Plaintiff Felix Enrique Valdez (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action was initiated on May 7, 2021. (ECF No. 1.) Pursuant to the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (“PLRA”), “[n]o action shall be brought with respect to prison conditions under [42 U.S.C. § 1983], or any other Federal law, by a prisoner confined in any jail, prison, or other correctional facility until such administrative remedies as are available are exhausted.” 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). Prisoners are required to exhaust 25 …