Saxton

United States v. Saxton

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 10, 20211:20-cv-01278California1,070 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CASE NO. 1:20-cv-01278-AWI-SKO Petitioner, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT

v. PETITION TO ENFORCE

ADMINISTRATIVE SUBPOENA

ERNESTINA M. SAXTON, M.D., (Doc. No. 9) Respondent. 16 On September 4, 2020, the United States of America (the “Government”) filed a petition to enforce United States Drug Enforcement Administration (“DEA”) administrative subpoena R9- 19-179200 (the “Petition”) against Ernestina M. Saxton, M.D. (“Respondent”). Doc. No. 1. Respondent filed an opposition on October 2, 2020. Doc. No. 5. The Government replied on October 9, 2020. Doc. No. 6. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On December 10, 2020, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and a recommendation that the Government’s Petition to enforce the subpoena be granted. Doc. No. 9. Specifically, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.