Perea

(PC) Gradford v. Perea

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 11, 20211:20-cv-01342California1,913 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 WILLIAM J. GRADFORD, Case No. 1:20-cv-01342-NONE-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT THIS CASE BE

v. DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE,

BECAUSE OF PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO

SGT. PEREA, et al. PROSECUTE AND COMPLY WITH THE

COURT’S ORDER

Defendants. (ECF No. 11)

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

FOURTEEN DAYS 17 Plaintiff William J. Gradford is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action. For the reasons explained, the Court recommends that this case be dismissed because of Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute this case and comply with the Court’s order. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed this case on September 21, 2020, against Defendants Sgt. Perea, Sgt. R. Johnson, and Lt. Houston, generally bringing “supervisory liabilities claims”1 for their alleged connection to the alleged misconduct of Deputies T. Webster and F. Velasco while…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.