Perea
(PC) Gradford v. Perea
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 WILLIAM J. GRADFORD, Case No. 1:20-cv-01342-NONE-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,
RECOMMENDING THAT THIS CASE BE
v. DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE,
BECAUSE OF PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO
SGT. PEREA, et al. PROSECUTE AND COMPLY WITH THE
COURT’S ORDER
Defendants. (ECF No. 11)
OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN
FOURTEEN DAYS 17 Plaintiff William J. Gradford is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action. For the reasons explained, the Court recommends that this case be dismissed because of Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute this case and comply with the Court’s order. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed this case on September 21, 2020, against Defendants Sgt. Perea, Sgt. R. Johnson, and Lt. Houston, generally bringing “supervisory liabilities claims”1 for their alleged connection to the alleged misconduct of Deputies T. Webster and F. Velasco while…