Gradford

Gradford v. United States District Court Eastern District of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 11, 20211:21-cv-01019California793 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 WILLIAM J. GRADFORD, Case No. 1:21-cv-01019-DAD-BAM Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

REGARDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION FOR

v. FAILURE TO OBEY A COURT ORDER UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, (Doc. 2)

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA,

FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE Defendant.

13 Plaintiff William J. Gradford, proceeding pro se, filed the instant action on June 28, 2021. 14 (Doc. 1.) On July 1, 2021, Plaintiff was ordered to either submit a long form in forma pauperis 15 (“IFP”) application, or pay the $402.00 filing fee within thirty (30) days of the Court’s order. 16 (Doc. No. 3). Plaintiff was warned that failure to comply with the Court’s order would result in a 17 recommendation for dismissal of this action. (Id.) More than thirty days have passed since service 18 of the Court’s order and Plaintiff has not filed the proper IFP application, paid the filing fee, or 19 otherwise complied with the Court’s order. 20 Local Rule 110 provides that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.