Roe
Zoom Imaging Solutions, Inc. v. Roe
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ----oo0oo---- 11 ZOOM IMAGING SOLUTIONS, INC., No. 2:19-cv-01544 WBS KJN Plaintiff, v. ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
TO AMEND THE SCHEDULING ORDER
EDWARD ROE; MAXWELL RAMSAY; JON
CROSSEN; CORINNE FUERST; ANDREW
ALSWEET; KEVIN TOON; JASON
PEEBLER; ABIGAIL NEAL; POWER
BUSINESS TECHNOLOGY LLC; BRYAN
DAVIS; MAURA LOPEZ; JEFFREY
ORLANDO; JESSICA HINTZ; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, 19 Defendants.
21 ----oo0oo---- 22 On August 9, 2021, the court held a hearing on 23 plaintiff’s motion to amend the scheduling order to permit 24 plaintiff additional time to complete discovery in this case. 25 David Garcia appeared on behalf of the plaintiff. (See Docket 26 No. 164.) Nicholas Karkazis appeared on behalf of defendants Roe 27 and Power Business Technology, Inc. Joceline Herman appeared on 28 behalf of the remaining named defendants. (Id.) At oral argument, the parties jointly requested that the court schedule a Settlement Conference…