Roe

Zoom Imaging Solutions, Inc. v. Roe

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 11, 20212:19-cv-01544California809 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ----oo0oo---- 11 ZOOM IMAGING SOLUTIONS, INC., No. 2:19-cv-01544 WBS KJN Plaintiff, v. ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO AMEND THE SCHEDULING ORDER

EDWARD ROE; MAXWELL RAMSAY; JON

CROSSEN; CORINNE FUERST; ANDREW

ALSWEET; KEVIN TOON; JASON

PEEBLER; ABIGAIL NEAL; POWER

BUSINESS TECHNOLOGY LLC; BRYAN

DAVIS; MAURA LOPEZ; JEFFREY

ORLANDO; JESSICA HINTZ; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, 19 Defendants.

21 ----oo0oo---- 22 On August 9, 2021, the court held a hearing on 23 plaintiff’s motion to amend the scheduling order to permit 24 plaintiff additional time to complete discovery in this case. 25 David Garcia appeared on behalf of the plaintiff. (See Docket 26 No. 164.) Nicholas Karkazis appeared on behalf of defendants Roe 27 and Power Business Technology, Inc. Joceline Herman appeared on 28 behalf of the remaining named defendants. (Id.) At oral argument, the parties jointly requested that the court schedule a Settlement Conference…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.