(PS) Peccia v. State of CA Dept. of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAKE PECCIA, No. 2:18-cv-03049 JAM AC Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS STATE OF CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
AND REHABILITATION, Defendant. 17 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se, and the case was accordingly referred to the undersigned by Local Rule 302(c)(21). The sole defendant in this case, the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”), moves for summary judgment on all claims, ECF No. 69, and plaintiff opposes the motion, ECF Nos. 77, 78. The matter come on for hearing on July 28, 2021. ECF No. 93. For the reasons explained below, it is recommended that defendant’s motion be GRANTED, that summary judgment be entered in defendant’s favor, and that this case be closed. I. Background Plaintiff brought this discrimination and retaliation case against his employer, the California Department of Corrections and…