D'Agostini

(PC) Shropshire v. D'Agostini

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 12, 20212:21-cv-00466California3,947 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RYAN NEIL SHROPSHIRE, No. 2:21-cv-0466 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER JOHN D’AGOSTINI, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a county jail inmate proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims he received inadequate dental care while incarcerated in El Dorado County. Presently before the court is plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2), motion for medical records (ECF No. 6), and his complaint for screening (ECF No. 1). For the reasons set forth below, the court will grant the motion to proceed in forma paupers, deny the motion for medical records without prejudice, and give plaintiff the option to proceed with the complaint as screened or file an amended complaint. IN FORMA PAUPERIS Plaintiff has submitted a declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). (ECF No. 2.) Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.