Sherman
(PC) Rayford v. Sherman
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 EUGENE RAYFORD, 1:19-cv-00225-AWI-GSA-PC Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION
TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER
vs. (ECF No. 42.) SHERMAN, et al., ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO FILE
EXHAUSTION MOTIONS
15 Defendants. New Exhaustion Motion Filing Deadline: December 18, 2021 16 17 18 19 I. BACKGROUND Eugene Rayford (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case now proceeds with Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint, filed on January 11, 2021, against defendants Stu Sherman (Warden) and Richard Milam (Supervisor of Building Trades) (collectively “Defendants”) for subjecting Plaintiff to adverse conditions of confinement in violation of the Eighth Amendment. (ECF No. 24.)1 27 1 On March 9, 2021, the court issued an order dismissing all other claims and defendants from this case, for Plaintiff’s failure to state a claim. (ECF No. 28.) On May 18, 2021,…