Bumpus

Bumpus v. U.S. Financial Life Ins. Co.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 13, 20212:20-cv-00926California1,813 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PATRICK S. BUMPUS, individually, No. 2:20-cv-00926-MCE-AC and on behalf of the class, 12 Plaintiff, ORDER STAYING CASE v.

U.S. FINANCIAL LIFE INSURANCE

COMPANY, an Ohio Corporation, Defendant. 17 Plaintiff Patrick S. Bumpus (“Plaintiff”) alleges, both on his own behalf and on behalf of other similarly situated California residents, a collective action claim against Defendant U.S. Financial Life Insurance Company (“Defendant”) on grounds that Defendant has failed to comply with the provisions of California Insurance Code §§ 10113.71 and/or 10113.72, which pertain to the lapse or termination of life insurance policies. Plaintiff claims that although the provisions of those statutes were enacted effective January 1, 2013, they should apply retroactively and, in any event, should be extended to life insurance policies remaining in effect on or after that time (for example by way of renewal). This Court’s jurisdiction is premised on the Class Action…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.