(PC) Ennis v. California State Prison - Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 13, 20212:21-cv-00467California3,897 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 JOSEPH L. ENNIS, No. 2:21-cv-0467 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER CALIFORNIA STATE PRISON – SACRAMENTO, et al., 14 Defendants.

16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims that defendants failed to provide him adequate medical care in violation of his Eighth Amendment right. Presently before the court is plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) and his complaint for screening (ECF No. 1). For the reasons set forth below, the court will give plaintiff the option to proceed with the complaint as screened or file an amended complaint. IN FORMA PAUPERIS Plaintiff has submitted a declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). (ECF No. 2.) Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. Plaintiff is required to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00 for this action. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.