Daveiga

(PC) Navarro v. Daveiga

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 13, 20211:20-cv-00810California205 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARIO LOUIS NAVARRO, Case No. 1:20-cv-00810-JLT (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF

THE COURT TO CLOSE CASE

v.

DAVEIGA, et al., Defendants. 16 The parties have filed a stipulation of dismissal with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1). (Doc. 293.) The rule provides that a “plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing . . . a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Once a dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1) is properly filed, no order of the court is necessary to effectuate dismissal; the dismissal is effective automatically. See Com. Space Mgmt. Co. v. Boeing Co., 193 F.3d 1074, 1078 (9th Cir. 1999). Because the parties have filed a stipulation of dismissal, signed by all parties or their counsel of record, this case has ended. Accordingly, the Court DIRECTS the Clerk of the Court to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.