(PS) Anenson v. Vacaville Unified School District

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 13, 20212:20-cv-00901California4,740 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RYAN ANENSON; No. 2:20-cv-00901-MCE-DB

SARAH ANENSON

CHRISTIAN ANENSON, Plaintiffs, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER 14 v.

VACAVILLE UNIFIED SCHOOL

DISTRICT; DIXON UNIFIED SCHOOL

DISTRICT; SOLANO COUNTY

SPECIAL EDUCATION LOCAL PLAN

AREA; SOLANO COUNTY OFFICE

OF EDUCATION; and DOES 1-25, 18 inclusive, 19 Defendants.

Plaintiff Ryan Anenson (the “Student”) and his parents Sarah and Christian Anenson (the “Parents”) (collectively “Plaintiffs”) bring claims against Defendants Vacaville Unified School District (“VUSD”), Dixon Unified School District (“DUSD”), Solano County Special Education Local Plan Area (“SELPA”), and Solano County Office of Education (“SCOE”) based on an alleged abridgement of the Student’s educational rights and unlawful retaliation against Plaintiffs while the Student was attending Vacaville High School and Dixon High School. More specifically, Plaintiffs set forth claims under § 28 504 of the Rehabilitation Act (“Section 504”), 29 U.S.C. § 794,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.