CDCR
(PC) Alem v. CDCR
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 DANIEL ALEM, No. 2:17-CV-0343-KJM-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. ORDER M. CURRY, et al., Defendants. 15 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by Eastern District of California local rules. On May 6, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file objections within the time specified therein. Plaintiff filed timely objections to the findings and recommendations. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having reviewed the file, for the reasons explained below, the court adopts the findings relevant to the contention of defendants Ojo and Arnold that plaintiff failed to exhaust…