Estate of Tyler S. Rushing v. AG Private Protection, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ESTATE OF TYLER S. RUSHING, No. 2:18-cv-01692-MCE-AC et al., 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER v.
AG PRIVATE PROTECTION, INC.,
et al., Defendants. 17 By way of this action, Plaintiffs sought to recover for injuries sustained as a result 18 of a fatal altercation between Tyler S. Rushing (“Decedent”)1 and the following groups of 19 Defendants: (1) AG Security Protection, Inc. (“AG”), and AG security guard and 20 supervisor Edgar Sanchez (“Sanchez”) (collectively the “Security Defendants”); (2) the 21 City of Chico (the “City”), the Chico Police Department (“Chico PD”), Chico PD Sergeant 22 Scott Ruppel, and Officers Cedric Schwyzer, Alex Fliehr, and Jeremy Gagnebin 23 (collectively the “City Defendants”); and (3) the County of Butte (the “County”), the Butte 24 County Sheriff’s Office (“Sheriff’s Office”), and Deputy Sheriff Ian Dickerson (collectively 25 the “County Defendants”). On July 22, 2020, the Court entered judgment in favor of 26 Defendants. Presently before the Court are three separate…