(PC) Vargas v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 16, 20211:20-cv-00083California391 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DOMINIC (AKA DIAMOND) VARGAS, 1:20-cv-00083-NONE-JLT (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING WITHOUT

PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF

COUNSEL

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND (Doc. 21) REHABILITATION, et al.,

Defendants.

17 On August 12, 2021, Plaintiff filed a motion seeking the appointment of counsel. (Doc. 21.) Currently pending before the Court Plaintiff’s second amended complaint, which will be screened by the Court in due course. (See Doc. 20.) Plaintiff does not have a constitutional right to appointed counsel in this action, Rand v. Rowland, 113 F.3d 1520, 1525 (9th Cir. 1997), and the Court cannot require an attorney to represent Plaintiff pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Mallard v. U.S. Dist. Ct. for the S. Dist. of Iowa, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). The Court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel under section 1915(e)(1). Rand, 113 F.3d at 1525. However, without a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.