Ehlers

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROGELIO MAY RUIZ, Case No. 2:21-cv-00146-JAM-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

DENYING MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA

v. PAUPERIS AND REQUIRING PAYMENT OF

FILING FEE IN FULL WITHIN TWENTY-ONE

R. EHLERS, DAYS Defendant. ECF No. 2 OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN 14 DAYS 17 18 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding without counsel, has filed a complaint alleging claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 together with an application to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF No. 1 & 2. In an order filed March 15, 2021, I observed that it appeared that plaintiff is prohibited from proceeding in forma pauperis because he has previously had three actions dismissed for failure to state a claim. ECF No. 7; 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). I noted that plaintiff would still be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis if his complaint alleged that he is in imminent danger of serious physical injury. …