Dale

AFC Realty Capital, Inc. v. Dale

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 17, 20212:18-cv-02389California1,260 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AFC REALTY CAPITAL, INC., Case No. 2:18-cv-02389-MCE-JDP Plaintiff, v. ORDER SUNDEEP S. DALE; ROHIT

RANCHHOD; DALE INVESTMENTS,

LLC; SUNDEEP DALE, LLC;

CALIFORNIA FRUIT BUILDING, LLC;

and AMERICAN HOSPITALITY

SERVICES, INC.,

17 Defendants. 18 Plaintiff AFC Realty Capital, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) filed the operative Complaint against Defendants Sundeep S. Dale; Rohit Ranchhod; Dale Investments, LLC; California Fruit Building, LLC; and American Hospitality Services, Inc. (collectively “Defendants”). Presently before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Relief (ECF No. 38) from the Court’s October 13, 2020 Third Order. Plaintiff seeks relief, pursuant to Federal of Civil Procedure 60(b),1 from a typographical error that it claims extended the time for completing fact discovery a year longer than the parties intended. /// 27 1 All further references to “Rule” or “Rules” are to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure unless otherwise noted. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.