(PC)Dingle

(PC)Dingle v. Tesluk

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 17, 20212:20-cv-01878California507 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID W. DINGLE, No. 2:20-cv-1878 JAM DB P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS GREGORY C. TESLUK, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims defendants violated his rights under the Eighth Amendment. By order dated November 5, 2020 the court screened the complaint. (ECF No. 7.) It found plaintiff’s allegations failed to state a claim. The complaint was dismissed with sixty days leave to amend. On January 27, 2021, the undersigned issued findings and recommendations recommending that this action be dismissed for failure to file an amended complaint. (ECF No. 11.) Thereafter, plaintiff filed objections stating that a fellow inmate has been assisting him with this case, that inmate has all the materials related to this action, and that he cannot meet with that inmate because inmate movement is restricted…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.