Petersen

Petersen v. Sims

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 17, 20211:20-cv-00884California1,085 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KYLE PETERSEN, Case No. 1:20-cv-00884-DAD-EPG (PS)

Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE

ACTION SHOULD NOT BE

v. DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO SERVE,

FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH

ANTHONY SIMS, JR., THE COURT’S ORDER TO SUBMIT

DOCUMENTS FOR SERVICE, AND

Defendants. FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

(ECF NO. 23)

TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE

18 Plaintiff Kyle Petersen is a federal inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). Plaintiff filed his complaint on June 25, 2020, alleging that Defendant Anthony Sims, Jr., a special agent and computer forensic specialist employed by Homeland Security Investigations, violated his Fourth Amendment rights by reanalyzing, pursuant to a search warrant, forensic images obtained from his cell…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.