Cooley

Cooley v. Servicemaster Co. LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 17, 20212:20-cv-01382California4,219 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TYRON COOLEY, on behalf of himself No. 2:20-cv-01382-MCE-DB and all others similarly situated, 12 Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER v.

THE SERVICEMASTER COMPANY,

LLC, TERMINIX INTERNATIONAL,

INC., THE TERMINIX

INTERNATIONAL COMPANY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendants. 19 Plaintiff Tyron Cooley, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, (“Plaintiff”) seeks relief from Defendants The ServiceMaster Company, LLC, Terminix International, Inc., The Terminix International Company Limited Partnership, and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive (collectively, “Defendants” or “Terminix”) for violation of Cal. Lab. Code §§ 201-204; Cal. Lab. Code §§ 201-203, 226, 226.7, 510, 512, 1194, 2699 et seq., 2751, and 2802; applicable Industrial Welfare Commission Wage Orders; Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200, et seq.; and Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act of 2004 (“PAGA”). See Not. of Removal, Exhibit A, Jul. 8, 2020, ECF No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.