Urista

Urista v. Midland Funding, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 17, 20211:21-cv-00429California390 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 YAZMIN GARCIA URISTA, No. 1:21-cv-00429-NONE-SKO Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO ASSIGN A

DISTRICT JUDGE TO THIS MATTER AND

v. CLOSE THE CASE MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC, et al., (Doc. 12) Defendants. 16 On August 16, 2021, the parties filed a joint stipulation, signed by all parties who have appeared, that this action be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Doc. 12.) In relevant part, Rule 41(a)(1)(A) provides as follows: [A] plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing: (i) a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment; or (ii) a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A). Rule 41 thus allows the parties to dismiss an action voluntarily, after service of an answer, by filing a written stipulation to dismiss signed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.