(PC) Gunn v. Stanton Correctional Facility

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 17, 20212:21-cv-00456California288 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AUMINTRIUS DAMOUR GUNN, No. 2: 21-cv-0456 JAM KJN P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS STANTON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 By order filed July 8, 2021, plaintiff was granted thirty days to file an amended complaint. (ECF No. 14.) The July 8, 2021 order stated that failure to file an amended complaint within that time would result in the recommendation of dismissal of this action. (Id.) Thirty days from that date have now passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, or otherwise responded to the court’s order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.