(SS) Quintana v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 18, 20211:19-cv-00814California1,435 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALEX QUINTANA, JR., No. 1:19-cv-00814-DAD-EPG (SS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, (Doc. Nos. 15, 26) 15 Defendant.

17 Plaintiff Alex Quitana, Jr., proceeding in forma pauperis brings an action seeking judicial review of the Commissioner of Social Security’s final decision denying plaintiff’s application for benefits under the Social Security Act. (Doc. No. 1.) The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On November 4, 2020, the assigned magistrate judge entered findings and recommendations recommending that plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment be granted in part and denied in part and the Commissioner’s determination be reversed and the action be remanded for further administrative proceedings. (Doc. No. 26.) The findings and recommendations were served on the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.