Petersen
Petersen v. Buyard
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 18, 20211:20-cv-00999California5,271 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8 Case No. 1:20-cv-00999-DAD-EPG
KYLE PETERSEN, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
PROCEED WITH CASE
Plaintiff, 11 (ECF No. 12) v.
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
MEKIASH BUYARD,
THAT THIS CASE BE DISMISSED, WITH Defendant. PREJUDICE, BASED ON RES JUDICATA
AND FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM
15 (ECF No. 1)
OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN
TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS
18 Plaintiff, Kyle Petersen, is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action, filed on July 20, 2020, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF No. 1.) The complaint alleges that Mekisha Buyard, a California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation Parole Agent, violated his Fourth Amendment rights by unlawfully searching the contents of his various cell phones. Plaintiff filed a civil action on the same allegations against the same Defendant in Case No. 19-cv-235. (Case No. 19-cv-235, ECF No. 1). That case was dismissed by a final judgment on the merits on December 17, 2019. (ECF Nos. 21, 22;…