(SS) Luis Antonio Frausto v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 18, 20211:21-cv-01132California1,108 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LUIS ANTONIO FRAUSTO, Case No. 1:21-cv-01132-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT

v. JUDGE TO THIS ACTION

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING DENYING

Defendant. PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND

REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO PAY THE

FILING FEE

17 (ECF No. 4)

OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

DAYS

20 Luis Antonio Frausto (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint on July 26, 2021, challenging a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying his application for disability benefits. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff did not pay the filing fee in this action and instead filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (ECF No. 2.) On July 28, 2021, an order issued finding that Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis did not demonstrate entitlement to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.