Modhaddam
(PC) Morris v. Modhaddam
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CONDALEE MORRIS, No. 2: 18-cv-2850 MCE KJN P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS G. MODHADDAM, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On June 1, 2021, defendant Moghaddam filed a motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff did not file an opposition. On October 26, 2020, the court advised plaintiff of the requirements for opposing a motion pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 957 (9th Cir. 1998) (en banc), and Klingele v. Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 409, 411-12 (9th Cir. 1988). On July 12, 2021, plaintiff was ordered to file an opposition or a statement of non- opposition to the pending motion within thirty days. In that same order, plaintiff was advised of the requirements for filing an opposition to the pending motion and that failure to oppose such a