Warden

(HC) Hasan v. Warden

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 18, 20212:21-cv-00354California888 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CLARENCE NIMAR HASAN, No. 2:21-cv-0354 DB P Petitioner, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

WARDEN, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has paid the filing fee. Petitioner challenges his 2013 conviction in the Sacramento County Superior Court. Presently before the court is the petition for screening. For the reasons set forth below, the court will recommend that the petition be dismissed without leave to amend. SCREENING I. Screening Requirement Under Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, this court is required to conduct a preliminary review of all petitions for writ of habeas corpus filed by state prisoners. Pursuant to Rule 4, this court must summarily dismiss a petition if it “plainly appears from the petition and any attached exhibits that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.