Villarreal

(PC) Howell v. Villarreal

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 18, 20211:19-cv-01178California714 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KAREEM J. HOWELL, Case No. 1:19-cv-01178-NONE-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER

S. VILLARREAL, (ECF No. 46) Defendant. 16 Kareem J. Howell (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 9, 2021, Plaintiff filed what the Court construes as a motion for a protective order. (ECF No. 46). Plaintiff seeks to have his deposition conducted confidentially. Plaintiff also asks the Court to “personally speak with the deputy attorney general Andrea Sloan and ask that she to be very mindful in assuring that Plaintiff [sic] deposition is taken in a place where he’s not threaten & or has concerns of retaliation.” (ECF No. 46, p. 4). In response to Plaintiff’s motion, Defendant argues that Plaintiff’s deposition is not confidential. (ECF No. 48, p. 4). However, “CDCR staff will not be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.